<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting closer: Technology Enhanced Learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sebastiankelle.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/technology-enhanced-learning-why-bother/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sebastiankelle.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/technology-enhanced-learning-why-bother/</link>
	<description>Sebastian Kelle's Homepage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:23:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Sillaots</title>
		<link>http://sebastiankelle.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/technology-enhanced-learning-why-bother/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Sillaots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sebastiankelle.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Do I understand correctly this is a draft of some longer article “to be continued”? In this stage the Heading and the body of the text does not fit together. I was expecting that you are against the term TEL or against the learning in this way.
&lt;em&gt;edit: The title was originally &quot;TEL - why bother?&quot;. What I meant was rather &quot;why should we bother&quot;, so in that respect it was a bit misleading.&lt;/em&gt;
I’m agreeing that the TEL is synonym for e-learning of for b-learning (blended). And I don’t like LMS. This part of your article was really funny (but truth). But in the end of your article the text is loosing its sharpness. If your meaning is to describe pros and contras of TEL then can you describe those pros in same funny way as you described the contras?

I think the LMS was only one step in e-learning (html pages -&gt; LMS -&gt; social software like environments -&gt; you newer know what will be for next).

And I like reading text from computer. I don’t like books. Books do not have hyperlinks and Find command :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I understand correctly this is a draft of some longer article “to be continued”? In this stage the Heading and the body of the text does not fit together. I was expecting that you are against the term TEL or against the learning in this way.<br />
<em>edit: The title was originally &#8220;TEL &#8211; why bother?&#8221;. What I meant was rather &#8220;why should we bother&#8221;, so in that respect it was a bit misleading.</em><br />
I’m agreeing that the TEL is synonym for e-learning of for b-learning (blended). And I don’t like LMS. This part of your article was really funny (but truth). But in the end of your article the text is loosing its sharpness. If your meaning is to describe pros and contras of TEL then can you describe those pros in same funny way as you described the contras?</p>
<p>I think the LMS was only one step in e-learning (html pages -&gt; LMS -&gt; social software like environments -&gt; you newer know what will be for next).</p>
<p>And I like reading text from computer. I don’t like books. Books do not have hyperlinks and Find command <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
